I'm posting this stuff because I personally found it helpful to look at how other debaters structured and wrote their cases. Take what you want: the cards are pretty generic. I'd be hesitant to steal the analytics -- the warrants might be misunderstood since the arguments are minimal in explanation. I wrote them with the intention of explaining them in greater depth in cross-ex or later speeches. Email me if you have any questions at michael.harris.2013@lhsla.org.
Aff
Prelims Crime AC
TOC Natives Aff (unbroken)
Neg
Legal Positivism NC (Read in most prelims at Jan-Feb Tournaments)
Skep NC
Spec Theory